I was trying to watch the Pentagon briefing on the rescue of Capt. Phillips.

Sickening.

The first two questioners were sick.
Reuters asked for more details, the Admiral can not give them, at this time.
OK fine
The follow up question: What action was taken that led to the deaths of the 3 pirates? The tone of the question implies that the US Navy wrongfully killed those poor pirates.

Reuters is not an American agency, so naturally, they root for the pirates.

But NPR (National Public Radio) is funded by the US Government, my tax dollars pay the salary of Tom Bowman, the NPR reporter.

NPR: There was one pirate on the Bainbridge, what was he saying?
US Navy: Can not disclose that at this time.
NPR: How did the On Scene Commander know Capt Phillips' life was in danger?
US Navy: The pirates were pointing an AK-47 and a couple of handguns at him.
NPR: Was this the first time that had happened? How did this escalate?

Both Reuters and NPR were implying that the US Navy wrongfully shot those terrorists/pirates/criminals.

Why do reporters work so hard to protect terrorists/pirates?
Why do news agencies support the murderers?

Why does NPR, which is funded by the US Government, want to accuse the US Navy of murder?

Posted by: WordMarvin at 06:29 PM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 224 words, total size 1 kb.